[Bug] History records
complete
Say Something
The record of transferring ETH in History is displayed as Receive type. (There is no value in "-Assets", and there are actually some transfer records in the address)
Ashu
Say Something:
For now, we only handle ETH / ERC20 transfers and do not include Gas Fee for contract calls, but there is pretty much room to improve.
Your discovery is correct, it should be a bug in the History Module that makes send as receive.
As a thank you from Mest, we will give you a $100 reward, so please ensure that you submit a Typeform or DM Discord Admin.
Ashu
complete
Finch Wang
Say Something
Hi there, we have fixed the type display problem in some cases。
Thanks a lot for your feedback。
Say Something
Finch Wang: NICE DONE
Ashu
planned
Ashu
Thanks for the feedback.
Where "-Asset" has no value, that's because there are no tokens transferred, for example Claim Rank has no token transfer, it just calls the contract.
However, we have found other issues, such as the incorrect precision, where 0.02593396 ETH is expressed as 0.03 ETH.
Say Something
Ashu: So ETH is not considered a token in Mest's History module? The ETH transfer(out) record in the wallet address is not displayed as a Send type record?
Another example that makes me curious is that there are ETH receiving records and ETH transfer records in this wallet address, but there are only Receive types in the records of the History module. https://mest.io/stories/head-first-wallet?address=0x34e8DE7309A70953e0b83eD028E679914AEA8a2C
Ashu
Say Something:
For now, we only handle ETH / ERC20 transfers and do not include Gas Fee for contract calls, but there is pretty much room to improve.
Your discovery is correct, it should be a bug in the History Module that makes send as receive.
As a thank you from Mest, we will give you a $100 reward, so please ensure that you submit a Typeform or DM Discord Admin.
Ashu
under review